What will you answer me if I ask you this question?
What if in the "recent ads" block out of 10,000 new ones - one does not show up even once?
- this is your standard functionality, isn't it?
How would I make Premium? - Yes, in the same way that Google Adwords sells its premium places on search. Ad rotation. Google doesn't sell its 4 positions at the top of the page to only 4 advertisers, does it?
Do they do it somehow for the same search query? The easiest way - to show ads "in turn", "in a circle"?
And they increase the frequency of display depending on the amount of payment for showing an ad (from the bid). I have been doing promotion at Google Adwords for 15 years now, and I know perfectly well how they were able to solve this issue.
- But, you can't do that - You are not Google, and you do not have enough programming experience to do this (or enough?)- that's why I suggested the same path that you already applied - in the "recent ads" block - "Pseudo-random display of ads to customers"
I dare say that in the time that you spent answering me - you could have integrated the code that you showed me in one of your answers several times already. As far as I understand - you want to defend your point of view - but not to resolve the issue. It's a pity.
***
On this page you wrote that: "All OsclassPoint plugins were tested with theme"
https://osclasspoint.com/osclass-themes/general/delta-osclass-theme-i170The demo video clearly shows the premium block everywhere.
And, it CLEARLY shows the use of the OSClass-payment plugin.
At the same time, there are no restrictions on the number of premium ads.
Moreover, in the OS-Class pay plugin itself there is no limit on the number of premium ads displayed at the same time.
There is also no limit on how many people can order premium ads at the same time. That is, for my (for example) 4 allowed places - "premium promotion" can be bought by any number of people.
"Smooth things over", "cut corners" - I don't know how to translate it into English.
From which the client (I) created a false impression, and false expectations.
***
***
From my point of view, this is a banal omission at the design stage.
***
And the straight forward solution is to make the "premium block" sample the same as the "latest ads" sample. Just borrow for this ad marked as "premium". And refuse the sampling provided by the regular kernel engine.
Well, or just enter into the code what you once already wrote to me in the answer.
What is the difficulty, I do not understand?
Should I pay you 20 euros extra for this modification? Which will go into release, and which other users will be able to use?
Against the backdrop of the 1000 euros I paid for all your software and your plugins, 20 euros is not such a big amount. My time is worth more than all this correspondence and verbiage that is happening right now.
Let's solve the issue, shall we?
Or - this is not your theme/plugin, and under the license agreement with the developer - you do not have the right to change the functionality?
I don't understand you:
I found a problem that has been dragging on since the development stage.
I asked you to find his solution.
You showed it to me.
I suggested that you implement it.
You categorically stand your ground that "we will not implement", although you recognize the problem?
What is the question, I really don't understand you?
What will you choose now?
"Strike a pose" - to punish the "presumptuous clinet" who "dare to tell you" - and will you endlessly engage in demagoguery and polemics?
Or say:
Here's a great idea that will make my product better?